A new multi-criteria fusion model for color textured image segmentation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fusion of image segmentations using consensus clustering and based on the optimization of a single criterion (commonly called the median partition based approach) may bias and limit the performance of an image segmentation model. To address this issue, we propose, in this paper, a new fusion model of image segmentation based on multi-objective optimization which aims to avoid the bias caused by a single criterion and to achieve a final improved segmentation. The proposed fusion model combines two conflicting and complementary segmentation criteria, namely; the region-based variation of information (VoI) criterion and the contour-based F-Measure (precision-recall) criterion with an entropy-based confidence weighting factor. To optimize our energy-based model we use an optimization procedure derived from the iterative conditional modes (ICM) algorithm. The experimental results on the Berkeley database with manual ground truth segmentations clearly show the effectiveness and the robustness of our multi-objective median partition based approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it