Phase Behavior and Structural Characterization of Ionic Clathrate Hydrate Formed with Tetra-<i>n</i>-butylphosphonium Hydroxide: Discovery of Primitive Crystal Structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper reports phase equilibrium measurements and crystal structure analysis on the ionic clathrate hydrate formed from tetra- n -butylphosphonium hydroxide (TBPOH). Phase equilibrium temperatures were measured in the mole fraction range of TBPOH in aqueous solution from 0.0072 to 0.0416. The highest ionic clathrate hydrate–solution equilibrium temperature was determined to be 290.2 K at a TBPOH mole fraction of 0.0340, which corresponds to the congruent composition. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurements were performed on the crystal formed at 288.7 K, and the chemical composition of the TBPOH hydrate crystal was determined to be TBPOH·29.6H 2 O, which is consistent with the congruent composition obtained by the phase equilibrium measurement. The crystal structure of the TBPOH hydrate has a superstructure identical with Jeffrey’s type I cubic structure, with an I 4̅3 d space group with a lattice constant of 24.5191(13) Å. The TBPOH hydrate structure is compared with the same hydrate structure formed by the tetra- n -butylammonium fluoride. We provide a comprehensive overview of the dissociation temperature, the counteranion, and the hydrate structure regarding TBP and TBA salt hydrates. The dissociation temperatures decrease linearly with the increase in the partial molal volume of anions for TBA and TBP salt hydrates, changing the hydrate structures from the primitive cubic one that has the minimum hydration number.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".