MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2514995321 · doi:10.1109/isit.2016.7541674

Decoding analysis accounting for mis-corrections for spatially-coupled split-component codes

2016· article· en· W2514995321 on OpenAlexaff
Dmitri Truhachev, Alireza Karami, Lei Zhang, Frank R. Kschischang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDecoding methodsBCH codeComponent (thermodynamics)List decodingSequential decodingComputer scienceBinary symmetric channelAlgorithmBerlekamp–Welch algorithmCode (set theory)Binary numberConcatenated error correction codeTheoretical computer scienceLow-density parity-check codeBlock codeMathematicsArithmeticPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider an asymptotic iterative decoding analysis of spatially-coupled split-component codes used for communication over binary symmetric channel (BSC) with hard-decision decoding at the receiver. The proposed analysis takes into account the impact of mis-corrections that occur in component code decoding. The analysis technique models flows of corrections and mis-corrections that occur throughout the decoding process in the entire coupled code chain. The results for spatially-coupled split-component codes with BCH component codes demonstrate that the analysis provides significantly more accurate estimates of the iterative decoding threshold values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.915
Threshold uncertainty score0.660

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207