MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515070979 · doi:10.18666/jlr-2016-v48-i1-6270

Grandparents' Reflections on Family Leisure

2016· article· en· W2515070979 on OpenAlexaffabout
Shannon Hebblethwaite

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Leisure Research · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGrandparentPsychologySocial psychologyLeisure timeSociologyRecreationDevelopmental psychologyPhysical activityPolitical scienceMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leisure plays an important role in family relations, yet family leisure scholars have paid scant attention to the experiences of grandparents in the family system. The purpose of the current study is to explore the meaning of family leisure for grandparents who have adult grandchildren. Using an inductive, qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 30 Canadian grandparents who had adult grandchildren. Findings are discussed in relation to two key themes that illustrate the purosive nature of family leisure for grandparents, including@ a) centrality of family leisure in developing family ties, and b) family leisure as a means for the transmission of family values.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.182
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.268
GPT teacher head0.514
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Leisure ResearchSame topicRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness ManagementFrench-language works237,207