MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515207502 · doi:10.7202/1074314ar

Les liaisons sémantiques existant entre les catégories « naissance/jeunesse/vie » et « maturité/vieillesse/mort »

2020· article· fr· W2515207502 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Jean-Michel Vidal

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dans un premier temps et à l’aide d’exemples pris en Occident et en Afrique de l’Ouest (principalement chez les Dogons du Mali), cet article se propose d’explorer à travers les « logiques » des cycles de vie, certaines caractéristiques relatives aux concepts de naissance, de jeunesse, de vieillesse et de mort. Les liens qui se tissent entre ces différents concepts et leurs représentations s’agencent et s’entremêlent différemment au fil des cultures et du temps pour nous permettre, entre autres, d’affronter le chaos existentiel que nous expérimentons tous lorsque « jeunesse » et « mort » se juxtaposent en se télescopant comme c’est le cas lors de la mort d’un enfant. Dans un deuxième temps, cet article s’attache alors à comprendre les glissements sémantiques de ces catégorisations qui oscillent entre un ordre purement biologique et un ordre essentiellement symbolique. Ces glissements sémantiques sont à lire et à comprendre sur leurs horizons macrocontextuel, microcontextuel et individuel, mais aussi en fonction des normes et des valeurs culturelles et temporelles qui les sous-tendent et les rationalisent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontièresSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207