MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515336782 · doi:10.3406/mhnly.2010.1510

Le musée comme lieu de fréquentation à travers la diversité des expériences

2010· article· fr· W2515336782 on OpenAlex
Jean-Marc Blais

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLes Cahiers du Musée des Confluences Revue thématique Sciences et Sociétés du Musée des Confluences · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicMuseums and Cultural Heritage
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le musée est-il un lieu d'éducation ou un lieu de divertissement et de culture de masse ? Il est l'un et l'autre. Dans un pays comme le Canada, où le concept de diversité se définit sous plusieurs angles, le musée de l'avenir sera celui qui saura s'adapter aux réalités changeantes de la société, non seulement en offrant des collections qui reflètent la composition de cette société, mais aussi en se présentant comme une destination culturelle. Ainsi, le «visiteur » sera convié à devenir un «fréquenteur » dans un musée où seront pris en compte ses identités et ses intérêts véritables. Pour y arriver, il faudra de la franchise, un investissement considérable d'énergie, et surtout ne pas craindre d'entrer en compétition avec les autres diffuseurs de la culture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.514
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.061
Scholarly communication0.0050.006
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it