MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515532903 · doi:10.5539/ass.v12n9p9

Off-campus Entrepreneurship Tutorial System in China

2016· article· en· W2515532903 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lixia Wen

Bibliographic record

VenueAsian Social Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicReflective Practices in Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaEntrepreneurshipPerfectionPerspective (graphical)Sustainable developmentEngineering ethicsEntrepreneurship educationEntrepreneurial educationTutorial systemEngineering managementPolitical scienceSociologyBusinessComputer scienceMathematics educationEngineeringPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, with the reform of undergraduate teaching constantly goes deeper, it is the wave of future to think and explore a newly efficient way to cultivate innovative talents for adapting the higher education development in China. From the perspective of the Oxford Tutorial, the paper indicates the perfection of Off-campus Entrepreneurship Tutorial System and presents the proper strategies from five aspects, in combination of entrepreneurial education of Chinese undergraduates. Furthermore, the strategies can be helpful in training talents and for sustainable higher education development. The paper tries to make the tutorial system play a more important role in training the innovative talents meeting all requirements needed of society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.343 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAsian Social ScienceSame topicReflective Practices in EducationFrench-language works237,207