Experimental Studies of Reboiler Heat Duty for CO<sub>2</sub> Desorption from Triethylenetetramine (TETA) and Triethylenetetramine (TETA) + <i>N</i>-Methyldiethanolamine (MDEA)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Amine scrubbing is regarded as one of the most suitable technologies for postcombustion CO 2 capture. However, data on regeneration energy and performance is limited in literature. In this study, the reboiler heat duties of triethylenetetramine (TETA) and triethylenetetramine (TETA) + N -methyldiethanolamine (MDEA) were experimentally evaluated in a bench-scale stripper packed with Dixon ring random packing. The effects of various operating parameters on the desorption performance (presented in terms of reboiler heat duty, Q reboiler ) were investigated, including lean loading, rich loading, amine concentration, solvent flow rate, and amine type. The experimental results showed that the Q reboiler was very sensitive to these process parameters. In addition, a comparison of the Q reboiler of TETA, monoethanolamine (MEA), and diethylenetriamine (DETA) was conducted to evaluate the potential for TETA’s application in the CO 2 capture process. The results obtained in this work showed that the Q reboiler of TETA, as a function of amount of CO 2 released, is lower than that of MEA and DETA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".