MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515614458 · doi:10.1002/adem.201600226

Superconducting Resonators Based on TiN/Tapering/NbN/Tapering/TiN Heterostructures

2016· article· en· W2515614458 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Engineering Materials · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum and electron transport phenomena
Canadian institutionsCanadian Institute for Advanced ResearchPerimeter InstituteUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceTinTaperingHeterojunctionSapphireOptoelectronicsSputter depositionStackingSuperconductivityResonatorSputteringNanotechnologyCondensed matter physicsThin filmMetallurgyOpticsNuclear magnetic resonanceLaser

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We fabricated a type of superconducting heterostructures, TiN/tapering/NbN/tapering/TiN, on c‐cut sapphire substrates by reactive magnetron sputtering. The goal is to achieve an x‐band resonator that maintains a high Q in modest magnetic fields. The structure shows (111) orientation with local epitaxial correlation, as a result of stacking face‐centered‐cubic structures on top of hexagonal‐close‐packing substrates. The artificial tapering layers vary gradually from NbN into TiN and vice versa, creating a smooth transition so that no distinct interface exists. We characterized microstrip single line resonators on these heterostructures that are promising candidates for quantum information processing with hybrid nuclear‐electron spins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it