Réguler aussi avec l’informel. L’informalisation de l’État au coeur de l’emploi des jeunes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article met l’accent sur le caractère multiple de l’informalisation de l’État à travers ses manifestations dans le domaine de l’emploi des jeunes en Argentine. Outre sa manifestation principale, soit le travail informel ou non déclaré, l’informalité émerge également au coeur de l’emploi formel et protégé à travers des situations plus ou moins légales, difficiles à réguler pour l’État, malgré la longue liste des mesures visant cet objectif. L’informalité résulte paradoxalement de l’action de l’État en raison de l’ambigüité des programmes directs ou indirects qui, en visant à développer la capacitation, l’employabilité, l’inclusion sociale ou la formalisation de l’emploi non déclaré, reproduisent des situations d’informalité du travail chez les jeunes. Ces éléments sont illustrés avec des données d’une recherche qualitative et longitudinale sur les parcours professionnels de jeunes en Argentine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".