MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515643459 · doi:10.7202/1037071ar

Réguler aussi avec l’informel. L’informalisation de l’État au coeur de l’emploi des jeunes

2016· article· fr· W2515643459 on OpenAlex
María Eugenia Longo

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLatin American socio-political dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’article met l’accent sur le caractère multiple de l’informalisation de l’État à travers ses manifestations dans le domaine de l’emploi des jeunes en Argentine. Outre sa manifestation principale, soit le travail informel ou non déclaré, l’informalité émerge également au coeur de l’emploi formel et protégé à travers des situations plus ou moins légales, difficiles à réguler pour l’État, malgré la longue liste des mesures visant cet objectif. L’informalité résulte paradoxalement de l’action de l’État en raison de l’ambigüité des programmes directs ou indirects qui, en visant à développer la capacitation, l’employabilité, l’inclusion sociale ou la formalisation de l’emploi non déclaré, reproduisent des situations d’informalité du travail chez les jeunes. Ces éléments sont illustrés avec des données d’une recherche qualitative et longitudinale sur les parcours professionnels de jeunes en Argentine.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.288
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.008
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it