Proxy Modeling of the Production Profiles of SAGD Reservoirs Based on System Identification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Large scale physics-based reservoir models are employed routinely in the prediction of the behavior of steam assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) processes under different operational situations. However, parametric uncertainty persists in these models even after history matching with production data. This uncertainty, and the computational cost associated with the full-scale reservoir simulations, makes it challenging to use reservoir simulators in closed-loop control of reservoirs. As an alternative strategy, we present in this work a dynamic proxy model for the reservoirs based on system identification and the prediction error method using only injection and production data. These proxy models are validated against field data from a SAGD reservoir and simulated synthetic reservoir data and shown to be appropriate for use in model predictive control. We also provide evidence that the predictive power of these models can be improved by the appropriate design of input signals (injection rates and pressures).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it