Experimental study on turbulence properties in the dual nozzle opposed impinging stream mixer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The impinging stream reactor currently under study, especially in processes of fluid mixing, is employed in a variety of applications that include pharmaceuticals, petroleum, and provisions. The distributions of three‐dimensional velocity fluctuation in the dual nozzle opposed impinging stream mixer were measured experimentally using laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV). The results showed that stagnation points were in proximity of the line of z = 0 under experimental conditions, but the exact positions of these stagnation points shifted with different nozzle diameters, nozzle spacing, and inlet flow rates. The distributions of RMS velocity and turbulent kinetic energy were similar in the same operating condition, but turbulence intensity changed obviously on the z axis ranging from −10 mm to 30 mm, in which region turbulence was intense and the large turbulence intensity was advantageous to mixing. The RMS velocity was influenced obviously by changing distance between nozzles, the turbulence intensity was affected greatly by the nozzle diameters, and the region of high turbulent kinetic energy which was beneficial to mixing was enlarged by increasing inlet flow rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".