MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515764487 · doi:10.1111/bij.12874

No universal differences between female and male eukaryotes: anisogamy and asymmetrical female meiosis

2016· article· en· W2515764487 on OpenAlexafffund
Root Gorelick, Jessica Carpinone, Lindsay Jackson Derraugh

Bibliographic record

VenueBiological Journal of the Linnean Society · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant and animal studies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBiologyMeiosisSpermPloidyGameteMeiosis IIEvolutionary biologyPollenZoologyGeneticsEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We previously showed that, across eukaryotes, universal differences do not exist between diploid females and males; hence, in the present study, we examine haploid stages. Unlike animal sperm, flowering plant sperm have nuclear pores, and so cannot be used to distinguish haploid females from males. Female and male gametes are not complementary: eggs and can fertilize eggs, whereas sperm can fertilize sperm, in some taxa. One sex of gametes is not universally parasitic on the other. Commonly held differences between eggs and sperm (e.g. only eggs, and not sperm, are large, long-lived, and immobile) do not apply to many eukaryotes. Many or all angiosperms have small eggs, sperm without flagella, and long-lived pollen. In many plants, we supposedly can distinguish females from males, although they have similar sized gametes. Theories of anisogamy are based on less energy being required to produce small sperm than large eggs. However any selective advantage of smaller sperm is nullified by sequestering most cytoplasmic biomass as residual bodies following meiosis in metazoa. Moreover, zoidogamous gymnosperms have numerous huge sperm. In both animals and plants, sperm are not the immediate products of meiosis but, instead, develop afterwards via haploid cell divisions. Consequently, we examined whether the most promising universal sexual difference in animals applies to plants and stramenopiles, namely asymmetrical female meiosis vs. symmetrical male meiosis. A few angiosperms (and some animals) have asymmetrical male meiosis, whereas many plants have symmetrical female meiosis. All bryophytes and stramenopiles with UV chromosomes do not have asymmetrical female meiosis insofar as meiosis produces two female and two male gametophytes. Homosporous monilophytes, lycophytes, and anthocerotophytes lack female vs. male meiosis, although they have distinct eggs and sperm. Therefore, currently, there are no universal criteria for distinguishing females from males across all animals, across all plants or across all stramenopiles, let alone across all eukaryotes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.144 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiological Journal of the Linnean SocietySame topicPlant and animal studiesFrench-language works237,207