MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515831703 · doi:10.1109/pn.2016.7537955

Integrated silicon photonics transduction of even nanomechanical modes in a doubly clamped beam

2016· article· en· W2515831703 on OpenAlexaff
Jocelyn N. Westwood‐Bachman, Wayne K. Hiebert, Vincent T. K. Sauer, Daniel Bachman

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMechanical and Optical Resonators
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResonatorPhotonicsDisplacement (psychology)SiliconBeam (structure)Transduction (biophysics)AnalyteMaterials sciencePhysicsOptoelectronicsOpticsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nanomechanical devices have significant potential as mass sensors because small changes in vibrational resonance frequency can be translated to mass of an analyte for single-molecule detection. By observing multiple vibrational modes simultaneously, the mass and position of the adsorbed analyte can be determined more accurately. Additionally, by using optomechanical actuation and detection of nanomechanical devices, the displacement sensitivity can be improved significantly, which is highly beneficial for mass sensing applications. In particular, optomechanical transduction can be achieved using integrated photonics, which is a compact approach that greatly simplifies the optomechanical measurement. However, even vibrational modes are difficult to detect with integrated photonics, since with even modes there is a zero effective index shift over the vibrating beam. In this work, we demonstrate the measurement of even nanomechanical modes. We fabricated a doubly clamped beam by releasing a straight section of an optical racetrack resonator from the silicon dioxide underneath. By performing this process twice, a step is fabricated in the substrate beneath the beam. The step permits the excitation and detection of even modes of vibration due to a nonzero effective index shift. Transduction of odd modes is retained. The displacement sensitivities of the first through third modes are obtained from measurements of the thermomechanical noise floor, and are 228 fm Hz-1/2, 153 fm Hz-1/2, and 112 fm Hz-1/2, respectively. The devices are actuated by the optical force, by modulating a pump laser with an electro-optic modulator. With the addition of the driving force, up to the fifth vibrational mode is observed. The driving force for the first through third modes is compared and modeled based on integration over the mode shapes. Since the step length is approximately 38% of the beam length, the optical force on each mode is approximately 0.4 pN μm-1mW-1for an applied optical power of 0.07 mW.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMechanical and Optical ResonatorsFrench-language works237,207