MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515843661 · doi:10.1515/ans-2009-0303

Solitary Waves for Quasilinear Schrödinger Equations Arising in Plasma Physics

2009· article· en· W2515843661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Nonlinear Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Physics Problems
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipative systemSuperfluidityMathematical physicsPhysicsNonlinear systemNonlinear Schrödinger equationSchrödinger equationSpace (punctuation)MathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract We study the quasilinear Schrödinger equation iz t = −∆z +W(x)z − η(|z| 2 )z − k[∆p(|z| 2 )]p′(|z| 2 )z in ℝ 2 , where W : ℝ 2 →ℝ is a positive potential and the nonlinearity η : ℝ 2 × ℝ → ℝ has critical or sub-critical exponential growth. Quasilinear Schrödinger equations of this type have been studied as models of several physical phenomena such as superfluid film equation, in the theory of Heisenberg ferromagnets and magnons, in dissipative quantum mechanics and in condensed matter theory. In a suitable Orlicz space together with Trudinger-Moser inequality we establish an existence of standing wave solutions for this problem. The second order nonlinearity considered in this paper corresponds to the superfluid equation in plasma physics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.084
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it