MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2515865975 · doi:10.1117/12.2234651

The upgraded telescope control system performance for the Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope

2016· article· en· W2515865975 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Windell H. Jones-Palma, Brandon Metz, Kevin Ho, Jim Thomas

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensing
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPMACTelescopeMaintainabilityComputer scienceUpgradeComputer hardwareControl systemElectrical engineeringPhysicsOperating systemEngineeringAstronomySoftware engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) completed the first phase of its TCS upgrade in early 2015. Prior to this effort, the previous version of CFHTs TCS was largely unmodified since it began operation in 1979 and had begun to exhibit reliability and maintainability issues entering its third decade of operation. The first phase consisted of replacing the custom-built servo control hardware built by the Canadian Marconi Company with an off-the-shelf Delta Tau Systems Power PMAC and replacing the absolute and incremental encoders with modern equivalents. Adapting the motion control algorithms used within the Power PMAC for real-time control of the telescope on the sky posed unique challenges. This work brie y summarizes the design for the upgraded TCS at CFHT, describes the solutions that adapted the traditional use of the Power PMAC for use at CFHT, and discusses the improved performance of CFHTs new TCS in terms of decreased time to target and tracking error.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.887
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicAdaptive optics and wavefront sensingFrench-language works237,207