Behavior of Surface-Functionalized Multiwall Carbon Nanotube Nanofluids during Phase Change from Liquid Water to Solid Ice
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Multiwall carbon nanotube (MWCNT) nanofluids have been shown to enhance the crystallization process of water to ice. While the beneficial effects of MWCNTs on phase change processes are well-documented, little work has been conducted to investigate the behavior of MWCNTs during and after exposure to freezing conditions. In this work, the crystallization morphology of water droplets containing surface-functionalized hydrophilic MWCNTs was evaluated at three driving force temperatures and two concentrations of nanofluid. At low supercoolings, the MWCNTs are completely expelled from the crystal matrix due to slow solidification rates. At high supercoolings, the MWCNTs are embedded in the solid droplet within air volumes and interdendritic regions as a result of rapid crystallization speeds. The results show that the dispersion of MWCNTs within the solid ice matrix itself was not achieved at these levels of supercooling. Under all conditions, freezing of the colloidal system results in destabilization of the MWCNTs and loss of dispersion. These effects are important considerations for applications requiring successful freeze/thaw cycling of nanofluid systems as well as in the storage and transport of colloidal suspensions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it