Pathway-based approach using hierarchical components of collapsed rare variants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
MOTIVATION: To address 'missing heritability' issue, many statistical methods for pathway-based analyses using rare variants have been proposed to analyze pathways individually. However, neglecting correlations between multiple pathways can result in misleading solutions, and pathway-based analyses of large-scale genetic datasets require massive computational burden. We propose a Pathway-based approach using HierArchical components of collapsed RAre variants Of High-throughput sequencing data (PHARAOH) for the analysis of rare variants by constructing a single hierarchical model that consists of collapsed gene-level summaries and pathways and analyzes entire pathways simultaneously by imposing ridge-type penalties on both gene and pathway coefficient estimates; hence our method considers the correlation of pathways without constraint by a multiple testing problem. RESULTS: Through simulation studies, the proposed method was shown to have higher statistical power than the existing pathway-based methods. In addition, our method was applied to the large-scale whole-exome sequencing data with levels of a liver enzyme using two well-known pathway databases Biocarta and KEGG. This application demonstrated that our method not only identified associated pathways but also successfully detected biologically plausible pathways for a phenotype of interest. These findings were successfully replicated by an independent large-scale exome chip study. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An implementation of PHARAOH is available at http://statgen.snu.ac.kr/software/pharaoh/ CONTACT: tspark@stats.snu.ac.kr SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".