Les traces de la formation indo-européaniste de Saussure dans le CLG
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fondateur de la linguistique générale, Saussure était, avant tout, un linguiste historique et connaissait bien les méthodes de la reconstruction de l’indo-européen, laquelle se fonde sur la connaissance des langues anciennes. Cet article vise à montrer la transition des études indo-européennes aux études théoriques sur la langue chez Saussure, et surtout à mettre en évidence le lien existant entre elles dans le CLG. En vue de reconstruire cette transition, il analyse également les éditions des trois cours universitaires qui sont à la base du CLG, de même que les manuscrits saussuriens découverts en 1996. Nous pouvons constater que certaines parties du CLG, notamment la troisième, consacrée à la linguistique diachronique, seraient impensables en dehors d’une solide formation dans le domaine de la linguistique historico-comparative et que, même les parties les plus théoriques, sont illustrées par des exemples et des raisonnements émanant précisément de sa formation d’indo-européaniste.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".