Riparian Management of Perennial Coastal Streams with Potential Habitat for a Tailed Frog (Ascaphus truei)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Assessments were conducted at stream reaches associated with recent harvesting in the mid-coast of British Columbia to: 1) determine how riparian vegetation has been managed around coastal streams that do not typically require a riparian reserve, but contain potential habitat for tailed frogs, and 2) correlate harvest prescriptions with habitat quality. The results are intended to guide decisions related to harvesting around small fish-bearing, and all non-fish streams on the mid-coast of BC. We found that bedrock-dominated reaches exhibited less disturbance than erodible streams when subjected to riparian cutting but their confined channels may have facilitated the transfer of road debris downstream, creating blockages and dewatering. Tailed-frog tadpoles were observed where some riparian harvesting had occurred, but the channels were stable and stream flow undisturbed. Recommendations for best practices when planning to harvest around perennial coastal streams include the consideration of geologic site characteristics prior to making harvesting decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".