MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516182699 · doi:10.3917/afco.256.0035

Diaspora Voting in South Africa

2016· article· fr· W2516182699 on OpenAlexaff
Elizabeth Iams Wellman

Bibliographic record

VenueAfrique contemporaine · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiaspora, migration, transnational identity
Canadian institutionsFrancophone University Association
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceDiasporaHumanitiesArtLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article analyse l’histoire complexe de la participation de la diaspora sud-africaine aux élections du pays d’origine depuis l’abolition du régime d’apartheid. Après avoir permis le vote à l’étranger lors de l’élection historique de 1994, le gouvernement sud-africain a aboli cette mesure jusqu’à ce qu’une décision de la Cour constitutionnelle de 2009 l’autorise à nouveau. L’auteure invite tout d’abord à porter une plus grande attention à la nature du processus d’adoption du vote à distance. Le cas de l’Afrique du Sud montre que la perception que les partis politiques ont de la diaspora exerce une influence déterminante sur l’adoption et la mise en œuvre du vote à l’étranger. Ainsi, l’article place les partis politiques au centre de l’analyse de la généralisation du vote des diasporas depuis le début des années 1990.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAfrique contemporaineSame topicDiaspora, migration, transnational identityFrench-language works237,207