MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516206709

The changing attitudes of junior miners

2013· article· en· W2516206709 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
John Ollett

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial Minerals · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMining Techniques and Economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFrontierDownstream (manufacturing)Upstream (networking)Product (mathematics)Key (lock)GraphiteBusinessMarketingIndustrial organizationManagementEngineeringPolitical scienceEconomicsComputer scienceLawComputer securityTelecommunicationsMaterials scienceMetallurgy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The initial processing [to reach a mixed rare earths concentrate] is not unlike other mineral processing, Paul McGuinness, Frontier Rare Earths CFO, told IM. It is just sound business, [Jim McKenzie] told IM. If you have a product that is increasingly valuable, you use the ability go downstream because of the good economics involved. Focus Graphite, a Canadian graphite developer, focuses on both the upstream mining and the downstream processing. This was key to securing a cost-leading competitive advantage, Gary Economo, CEO, told IM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.062

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.007
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.006
Research integrity0.0040.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial MineralsSame topicMining Techniques and EconomicsFrench-language works237,207