New WHO histological classification of renal epithelial tumors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sažetak.Napredak u dijagnostici proveden na temelju morfologije, imunohistokemije i molekularnih metoda doveo je do identifikacije novih entiteta u patologiji bubrežnih tumora.Iz tih je razloga Međunarodno društvo za urološku patologiju (ISUP) preporučilo izmjene klasifikacije tumora bubrega SZO-a 2004.pod nazivom ISUP Vancouver Modifikacija SZO histološke klasifikacije bubrega tumora koja je i službeno, s manjim izmjenama ove, 2016.godine, predstavljena u 4. izdanju SZO-ove klasifikacije tumora mokraćnog sustava i muških spolnih organa.Cilj je ovoga članka kroz pregled literature ukratko predstaviti novu podjelu karcinoma bubrežnih stanica i nove entitete prepoznate po histološkim i genetskim karakteristikama te usmjeriti pažnju na važnost onih osobina tumora koje određuju stupanj i stadij bolesti, a imaju velik prognostički značaj.Nova će klasifikacija omogućiti patolozima da usuglase svoje izvještaje, a ostalim strukama dati uvid u promjene u nalazima patologa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".