MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516213582 · doi:10.1063/1.4962081

Effects of lens temperature on irradiance profile and chromatic aberration for CPV optics

2016· article· en· W2516213582 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIP conference proceedings · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Research ChairsEuropean Commission
KeywordsFresnel lensOpticsChromatic aberrationIrradianceMaterials scienceLens (geology)SiliconFocal lengthFresnel zone antennaOptoelectronicsChromatic scalePhysicsRadiation patternTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lens-based optical concentrators are currently the most common in concentrator photovoltaic systems. This paper discusses experimental results to quantify the effects of temperature on the primary optical elements of three commercial Fresnel-based designs. The designs are: Silicon on Glass Primary with no secondary, PMMA Primary with a Truncated Inverted Pyramid secondary, and a PMMA 4 quadrant Fresnel – Köhler system. We quantify the effects of temperature on the irradiance profile with the variation in peak to average ratio of from 25 – 50 ° C. Furthermore, the effect of temperature on chromatic aberration is represented with the ratio of the top subcell current to middle subcell for a standard triple junction germanium-based cell. For the system with the lowest peak-to-average ratio, PMMA-based 4 Fresnel-Kohler design, we observed a change of 2% in the subcell ratio when the lens was heated to 50 °C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.636
Threshold uncertainty score0.403

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it