Percentile Ranks of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale for Japanese Infant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
〔目的〕本研究ではAlberta Infant Motor Scale（以下AIMS）が日本人乳幼児においても適用可能かを知る目的で，標準的なPercentile ranksに着目して，その偏りの有無を調査した。〔対象〕主に保育園5カ所に通園する保護者から同意を得た乳幼児73名であった。〔方法〕理学療法士がAIMSのテキストを翻訳し，そのガイドラインに沿って対象を評価した。〔結果〕対象者73名中Percentile ranksの5％未満に8人，5-10％に4人，10-25％に10人，25-50％に14人，50-75％に10人，75-90％に3人，90%以上に24人が含まれた。また，対象を生後12ヶ月未満に限定した場合では，有意に適合しないとはいえない（p=0.422）結果となり，適合性は悪くなかった。〔結語〕日本人乳幼児の運動発達のAIMSのPercentile ranksにおいて低値を示す傾向は見られなかった。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".