MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516385370

Causviz: visual representations of complex causal semantics based on theories of perception

2011· article· en· W2516385370 on OpenAlexaff
Pourang Irani, Nivedita R. Kadaba

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Visualization and Analytics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCausality (physics)Semantics (computer science)Computer scienceCausal structureCausal modelAnimationPerceptionGraphTheoretical computer scienceNatural language processingArtificial intelligenceMathematicsProgramming languagePsychology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Michotte's theory of ampliation suggests that causal relationships are perceived by objects animated under appropriate spatiotemporal conditions. In this thesis I extend the theory of ampliation and propose that the immediate perception of complex causal relations is also dependent upon a set of structural and temporal rules. The thesis aims at achieving two main goals. The first goal is to define a taxonomy of semantics that describe different causal events in the environment. Ten semantics are defined in this thesis and divided into two main groups; simple causal semantics and complex causal semantics. Simple causal semantics describe basic semantics, which form the building blocks for more complex information and include causal amplification, causal dampening, causal strength, and causal multiplicity. Complex causal semantics are built by enhancing or combining one or more simple semantics and include additive causality, contradictive causality, fully-mediated causality, partially-mediated causality, threshold causality, and bidirectional causality. The second goal of this thesis is to design simple visual representations to describe the causal information. Three representation types were designed during the course of this research; static-graph, static-sequence, and animation. Nine experiments were also conducted to test the effectiveness of these representations. The first five experiments compared the static-graph and the animated representations through Memory Recall and Intuitiveness Evaluations tests. Results of these experiments suggest that animations were ∼8% more accurate and performed ∼9% faster than the static-graph representations. The last four experiments compared an enhanced static representation, called static-sequence, to the animations to test if sequential animation of causal relations had any influence on the superior performance of the animations in the previous experiments. Results of these experiments suggest that there was no significant difference in the performance of the static-sequence representations when compared to the static-graph representations. The results also suggest that the animations performed more accurately than their static counterparts mainly due to their intuitiveness. Overall our results show that animated diagrams that are designed based on perceptual rules such as those proposed by Michotte have the potential to facilitate comprehension of complex causal relations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.383

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.285 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicData Visualization and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207