MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516402644 · doi:10.5194/amt-2016-244

Radiative characteristics of aerosol under smoke mist conditions in Siberia during summer 2012

2016· article· en· W2516402644 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
T. B. Zhuravleva, Д. М. Кабанов, I. M. Nasrtdinov, T. V. Russkova, С. М. Сакерин, A. Smirnov, B. N. Holben

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric aerosols and clouds
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAerosolAERONETEnvironmental scienceAtmospheric sciencesSingle-scattering albedoSatelliteAngstrom exponentRadiative transferMeteorologyClimatologyGeographyPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Microphysical and optical properties of aerosol were studied during mega-fire event in summer 2012 over Siberia using ground-based measurements of spectral solar radiation at AERONET site in Tomsk and satellite observations. The data were analyzed using multiyear (2003–2013) measurements of aerosol characteristics under background conditions and for less intense fires, differing in burning biomass type, stage of fire, remoteness from observation site, etc. ("ordinary fires"). In June–August 2012, the average aerosol optical depth (AOD, 500 nm) had been 0.95 ± 0.86, about a factor of 6 larger than background values (0.16 ± 0.08), and a factor of 2.5 larger than in "ordinary smokes". The AOD values were extremely high on July 24–28 and reached 3–5. Comparison with satellite observations showed that ground-based measurements in the region of Tomsk not only reflect the local AOD features, but also are characteristic for the territory of the Western Siberia as a whole. Single scattering albedo (SSA, 440 nm) in this period ranged from 0.91 to 0.99 with the average of ~ 0.96 in the entire wavelength range of 440–1020 nm. The increase in absorptance of aerosol particles (SSA(440 nm)=0,92) and decrease in SSA with wavelength, observed in "ordinary smokes", agree with the data of multiyear observations in analogous situations in boreal zone of USA and Canada. Volume aerosol size distribution in smoke mist and ordinary smokes had bimodal character with significant prevalence of fine mode particles, but in summer 2012 the mean median radius and the width of the fine mode distribution somewhat increased. In contrast to data of multiyear observations, in summer 2012 an increase in the volume concentration and median radius of the coarse mode was observed with the growing AOD. The calculations of the "average" radiative effects of smoke and background aerosol are presented. As compared to background conditions and "ordinary smokes", under the conditions of smoke mist the cooling effect of aerosol considerably intensifies: direct radiative effects (DRE) at the bottom (BOA) and at the top of the atmosphere (TOA) are −13, −35, and −60 W m−2 and −5, −14, and −35 W m−2 respectively. The maximal values of DRE were observed on July 27 (AOD(500 nm)=3.5), when DRE(BOA) reached −180 W m−2, while DRE(TOA) and DRE of the atmosphere were −80 W m−2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsFrench-language works237,207