MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Cooperative Lethality of Polo-Like Kinases (PLK) and Aurora Kinases (AK) in Refractory Pediatric Leukemia

2012· article· en· W2516502471 on OpenAlexaff
Aarthi Jayanthan, Todd M. Cooper, Sandra E. Dunn, Victor Lewis, Aru Narendran

Bibliographic record

VenueBlood · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsChild and Family Research InstituteAlberta Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolo-like kinaseKinaseLeukemiaMitosisBiologyPLK1Cancer researchMitotic catastropheCell cycleCancerCell biologyImmunologyGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3573 Introduction: Recent studies have shown that cell cycle events are tightly controlled by complex and shared activities of a select group of kinases. Among these, Polo like kinases (Plk) are regulatory mitotic proteins that are overexpressed in several types of cancer and are associated with poor prognosis. Consequently, inhibitors for these kinases are currently being evaluated as anticancer drugs in Phase I and Phase II clinical trials. However, details of the mechanisms by which the interference of selective regulators of mitosis lead to cell death is currently unavailable. We describe experimental studies to further understand this process and to investigate the activity, drug combinability and target modulation of Plk inhibition in refractory pediatric leukemia cells. Methods: Cell lines derived from relapsed pediatric leukemia patients were used (n=12). These cells carry the spectrum of moleular abnormalites found in patients including MLL gene rearrangemnet with various fusion genes (Bcr-Abl), and biphenotypic features. Leukemia cells were incubated with increasing concentrations of the Plk1 inhibitor volasertib (BI 6727, Boehringer Ingelheim) and after four days in culture, cell growth characteristics including cellular morphology, ploidy status and cell survival were quantified by automated quantitative microscopy. IC50 values and combination indices were calculated according to the method of Chou and Talalay. Activities of intracellular signaling components and regulators of distinct apoptosis and autophagy pathways were identified by Western blot analysis. Results: Volasertib inhibited the growth of all leukemia cell lines tested, as well as primary specimens from leukemia patients, at sub-micromolar concentrations (IC50 from 1 × 10−6 to 1 μM). Microscopic and ultrastructural analyses revealed a corresponding increase in the number of cells displaying abnormal phenotype and mitotic catastrophe, a characteristic of Plk inhibition. Plk inhibition also resulted in an initial upregulation of Aurora-A and Aurora-B expression and the phosphorylation of Aurora-B and Aurora-C. However, sustained Plk inhibition led to time dependent dephosphorylation of Aurora-A. In addition, Plk inhibition resulted in Caspase-9 cleavage and decreased expression of autophagy related proteins (Atg3). Overall, significant synergy was observed when AK inhibitors were combined with Plk inhibition (CI = 0.02 – 0.8). Conclusions: We provide experimental data to show that Plk1 inhibition by volasertib significantly decreases the growth and survival of refractory pediatric leukemia cells in vitro. We also show synergy between AK and Plk inhibition in leukemia cells and that an effective target modulation by Plk inhibition leads to alterations in intracellular AKs in a time dependent manner. Our data provide relevant information regarding the relationship between the two kinases and the intracellular changes that can be used as biological correlates for therapeutic activity in future clinical studies. These findings provide initial pre-clinical evidence for Plk as a potentially effective target in pediatric leukemia therapy. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBlood→Same topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics→French-language works237,207→