Recycled Cross-Linked Polyethylene Foam Used for Floating Covers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper focuses on the use of recycled cross-linked polyethylene foam aggregates in conjunction with nonwoven geotextiles to produce a composite used for floating covers. These floating geosynthetic cover systems provide effective odor and air emissions control for manure storage structures, waste retention ponds and other odorous lagoons. This design approach allows rainwater to pass through the cover while scrubbing the odorous gases—thus avoiding collection, pumping, and associated maintenance/cost. Additional benefits include insulating properties that aid in the anaerobic process, blockage of sunlight to preclude algae growth, and water loss reduction due to evaporation. Heretofore typical available permeable covers to offer an aerobic environment were made from straw, peat-moss, or similar organic materials. However, these organic materials exhibit performance deficiency with respect to buoyancy and structural integrity. Further, they are vulnerable to wind, rain, hail, and fire damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".