MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516673486 · doi:10.2298/fil1713975a

A continued fraction of Ramanujan and some Ramanujan-Weber class invariants

2017· article· en· W2516673486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFilomat · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Identities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersUniversity Grants Commission
KeywordsRamanujan's sumMathematicsFraction (chemistry)Ramanujan tau functionTranscendental numberCombinatoricsPure mathematicsAlgebra over a fieldMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On Page 36 of his “lost” notebook, Ramanujan recorded four q-series representations of the famous Rogers-Ramanujan continued fraction. In this paper, we establish two q-series representations of Ramanujan’s continued fraction found in his “lost” notebook. We also establish three equivalent integral representations and modular equations for a special case of this continued fraction. Furthermore, we derive continued-fraction representations for the Ramanujan-Weber class invariants 1n and Gn and establish formulas connecting 1n and Gn. We obtain relations between our continued fraction with the Ramanujan-Göllnitz-Gordon and Ramanujan’s cubic continued fractions. Finally, we find some algebraic numbers and transcendental numbers associated with a certain continued fraction A(q) which is related to Ramanujan’s continued fraction F(a,b,λ,q), the Ramanujan-Göllnitz-Gordon continued fraction H(q) and the Dedekind eta function η(s).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.625

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it