MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516735405

Особенности государственной конфессиональной политики в отношении казаков-старообрядцев Северного Кавказа в период правления Николая I

2014· article· ru· W2516735405 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Письменная Татьяна Геннадьевна, Рябиков Александр Николаевич

Bibliographic record

VenueИсторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практики · 2014
Typearticle
Languageru
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicOttoman Empire History and Society
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConfessionalEliteIdeologyQuarter (Canadian coin)Context (archaeology)Political scienceGovernment (linguistics)HistorySociologyEthnologyLawPoliticsPhilosophyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article considers the directions of confessional policy in respect of the Cossacks Old Believers of North Caucasus in the context of interrelations between the central government, local elites and the Russian Orthodox Church. It is proved that in the second quarter of the XIX century in this region the all-Russian model of confessional course had characteristic differences due to the formation of new ideological conceptions by the North Caucasian elite that considered the Old Belief as a factor contributing to the successful solution of the military, social and economic problems of the Caucasian line Cossack troop.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.004
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueИсторические, философские, политические и юридические науки, культурология и искусствоведение. Вопросы теории и практикиSame topicOttoman Empire History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207