MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516792591 · doi:10.1109/plasma.2016.7534210

Generation of intense magnetic fields using orbital angular momentum modes of light in plasmas

2016· article· en· W2516792591 on OpenAlexaff
Andrew Longman, Fatema Liza, R. Fedosejevs

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAngular momentumMagnetic fieldZeeman effectFaraday effectPlasmaOpticsComputational physicsLaserAtomic physicsClassical mechanicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary form only given. Circularly polarized light has been successfully used to generate high strength axial magnetic fields in plasmas using high intensity laser pulses. These strong magnetic fields have been able to reach magnitudes approaching 1000 Tesla [1]. High strength magnetic fields have potential uses for guiding electron beams onto targets, such as for fast ignition of laser compressed fusion targets. Recent interest in orbital angular momentum (OAM) modes has shown that even linearly polarized light can potentially give rise to axial magnetic fields [2,3]. Laguerre-Gaussian (LG) modes carry both spin and OAM, generated by the rotating wave vector as opposed to that of a plane wave which contains only a spin component. In this work, the mathematics, geometry and simulation of the modes are discussed together with approaches to generating these OAM modes without the use of a spatial light modulator (SLM). Currently an experiment is being prepared to create such OAM modes using phase plates, while measurements of the magnetic field strengths produced will be measured using Zeeman splitting of bound-bound transitions of ion species in the plasma. Imaging the fields using inverse Faraday rotation measurements will also be investigated. The generation of such fields and the initial proposed measurements will be discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLaser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207