MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2516796527 · doi:10.1190/segam2016-13779535.1

A theoretical note on converted wave amplitude variation with offset in viscoelastic media

2016· article· en· W2516796527 on OpenAlexafffund
Shahpoor Moradi, K. A. Innanen

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsViscoelasticityAmplitudeOffset (computer science)Variation (astronomy)AcousticsPhysicsComputer scienceOpticsThermodynamics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Approximate converted PS-reflection coefficients for weak contrast interfaces separating isotropic viscoelastic media have been derived in this paper. This problem has been investigated by others but the changes in the attenuation angles across the boundary have been neglected. In this paper, we remove this limitation by deriving a formula for the PS-wave reflection coefficient considering the Snell's law which relates the transmitted attenuation angle for S waves in terms of incident attenuation angle. The AVO equation that we obtained is a complex function which for small angles has four terms from zeroth order up to the third order in sinθP. Viscoelastic converted PS-wave AVO comparing to the elastic converted PS-wave has two more term which are zeroth and second order in sinθP. These extra terms come from the inhomogeneity of the waves. We also compare the approximate linearized solutions with the exact solutions of Zoeppritz equations for three rock contrast model. Presentation Date: Monday, October 17, 2016 Start Time: 1:00:00 PM Location: 174 Presentation Type: ORAL

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→