Erratum to: Effect of interface on mid-infrared photothermal response of MoS2 thin film grown by pulsed laser deposition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The correspondence author in the original version of this article was unfortunately wrongly written on page 3571 and the first page of the ESM. Instead of Ankur Goswami1, Priyesh Dhandaria1, Soupitak Pal2, Ryan McGee1, Faheem Khan1, Željka Antić1, Ravi Gaikwad1, Kovur Prashanthi1, and Thomas Thundat1 (✉) It should read Ankur Goswami1 (✉), Priyesh Dhandaria1, Soupitak Pal2, Ryan McGee1, Faheem Khan1, Željka Antić1, Ravi Gaikwad1, Kovur Prashanthi1, and Thomas Thundat1 The email address of the correspondence author in the original version of this article was unfortunately wrongly written on the page 3571 and the first page of the ESM. Instead of Address correspondence to thundat@ualberta.ca It should read Address correspondence to agoswami@ualberta.ca
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".