MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2516937719 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7539118

A system-level design for foreground and background identification in 3D scenes

2016· article· en· W2516937719 on OpenAlexaff
Amin Safaei, Q. M. Jonathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceField-programmable gate arrayPipeline (software)Identification (biology)Digital signal processingSegmentationArtificial intelligenceComputer visionFeature extractionObject detectionComputer hardwareSystem on a chipVideo processingFeature (linguistics)Image processingChipEmbedded systemImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposes a system-on-chip (SoC) FPGA - based real-time video processing platform for background and foreground identification. Background and foreground identification is a co mmon feature in many tasks in video content analytics (VCA), including object detection, tracking, segmentation and recognition. VCA is a relatively new field in video processing; it has generally been implemented using two chips, with the image signal processing (ISP) part in a DSP or an FPGA and the VCA part executed by a processor. However, a new generation of SoC FPGAs that incorporates a processor and an FPGA into a single chip makes it possible for a single chip to perform both ISP and VCA. This study details the hardware implementation of a real-time background and foreground identification algorithm in an SoC, including the capture, processing and display stages. The proposed platform uses photometric invariant color, depth data and local binary patterns (LBPs) to distinguish backgrounds from foregrounds. The system uses minimal cell resources and tries to implement modules using a pipeline technique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.725
Threshold uncertainty score0.234

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.131
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207