Des manuels scolaires au service du Sonderfall helvétique (1911-2011)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le dernier quart du 19e siècle, les forces politiques bourgeoises au pouvoir en Suisse construisent une conception du monde helvétique évacuant la conflictualité de classe. Pour leur part, les manuels d’histoire du primaire et du secondaire du canton de Vaud offrent un laboratoire privilégié concernant le fonctionnement et la construction de ce discours. Ce Sonderfall helvétique (exception suisse) trouvera sa forme canonique à la fin des années 1930. Remis en cause brièvement, dans les manuels scolaires, à partir de la fin des années 1970, il retrouvera de la vigueur dès le début des années 1990. L’étude des légendes nationales permet d’observer le fonctionnement de ce discours, vecteur important de notre psyché collective qui nous empêche d’aborder sereinement nos rapports avec le monde extérieur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.013 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".