Estimation of Inter-Well Connections in Waterflood under Uncertainty for Application to Continuous Waterflood Optimization of Large Middle-Eastern Carbonate Reservoirs
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The management of large and mature waterfloods is a notoriously challenging exercise. The vast amount of data available usually cripples reservoir simulation efforts and operational teams usually revert to simple classical engineering calculations, diagnostics plots and maps to make their decisions. Some powerful technologies based on reduced-physics modeling have been developed over the past decade to address this issue. In this paper, we present one such approach that was designed for the management of a large Middle-East carbonate waterfloods. The reservoir model used is based on the Surveillance Model proposed by Batycky et al. (2008) but differs from it in two aspects: the inter-well allocation factors are computed through the solution of a tracer equation rather than through streamline computations and the fractional flow behavior is estimated through an empirical model rather than computed numerically. Using the tracer allows an improved treatment of unstructured grids and dual-porosity systems, both features being important for the application of interest. Modifying the fractional flow model allows for the automation of the history-matching step. The model can thus integrate new data quickly and estimate the strength and efficiency of each inter-well connection. An optimization algorithm is used to translate the reservoir management strategy of the asset team in terms of an objective function and a series of constraints at the well, well-group or facility level. Constraints such as voidage replacement ratios, surface facility limits, fracturing pressures can be integrated into the optimization engine to control the field. A new uncertainty modeling process uses a Markov-Chain Monte-Carlo algorithm to evaluate the robustness of each recommended change. The less mature or less data-rich areas of the field are typically harder to calibrate and more uncertain. Decisions to change the rate of a producer or injector in those areas are more risky. The algorithm is able to quantify this risk to help the operator make a more informed decision. As the field gains in maturity, the algorithm shows how the model learns with new data and how the proposed decisions continuously gain in robustness. The application of the methodology to giant Middle-East carbonate fields is discussed. The proposed methodology was able to integrate all relevant facility, well group, individual well and reservoir constraints but remains fast enough to be run daily as new data becomes available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".