MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517102863 · doi:10.1002/adfm.201602577

Spatio‐Temporal Control of Dynamic Topographic Patterns on Azopolymers for Cell Culture Applications

2016· article· en· W2517102863 on OpenAlexaff
Carmela Rianna, Lucia Rossano, Ravichandran H. Kollarigowda, Fabio Formiggini, Silvia Cavalli, Maurizio Ventre, Paolo A. Netti

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Functional Materials · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPhotochromic and Fluorescence Chemistry
Canadian institutionsNational Institute for NanotechnologyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceBiological systemConfocalIn situOrientation (vector space)NanotechnologyComputer scienceBiologyOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cell response to exogenous cues is the result of a complex integration of multiple biochemical/biophysical signals, which might occur simultaneously and might be characterized by specific spatial and temporal patterns. Among these signals, surface topography plays an important role in affecting cell functions and fate. However, the current understanding of the interplay between cells and topography relies on static environment. Here the intrinsic light‐responsive properties of azopolymers and the versatility of laser‐based confocal microscope technique is exploited, aiming to induce spatio‐temporal dynamic topographic changes in situ during cell culture. Diverse patterns can be designed on cell‐populated azopolymer films with high control on time, space, and on‐off signal modification. The technique proposed in this study enables the development of synthetic platforms that finely control cell orientation and migration both in time and space. The results may pave the way to unravel complex processes involved in cell‐topography interactions, thus allowing to define the spatio‐temporal features that most effectively influence cell functions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.109
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations70
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced Functional MaterialsSame topicPhotochromic and Fluorescence ChemistryFrench-language works237,207