MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517391189 · doi:10.15866/iremos.v9i3.8703

Analytical Modelling of Elastic-Plastic Interference Fit Joints

2016· article· en· W2517391189 on OpenAlexaff
Noreddine Laghzale, Abdel‐Hakim Bouzid

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInterference fitInterference (communication)Materials scienceStructural engineeringForensic engineeringMechanical engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The interference fit is a widely process, used to produce a joint assembly of two parts achieved by friction. It is a popular type of joint in machine elements and it is found in many field applications related to the automotive, aerospace, oil and gas and shipbuilding industries. Consequently, a better understanding of its limit behavior together with an accurate evaluation of the residual stresses generated by this process are very important for the design of mechanical components requiring high optimized performance. This work focuses on the analytical development of the residual stresses when the two assembled parts are circular cylinders and deform elasto-plastically under plane strain condition. The constitutive law that governs their material strain hardening behavior is assumed to follow a general power law which also covers the particular cases of elastic perfectly plastic and bilinear hardening. To validate the developed analytical model (AM), the finite element method (FEM) was used and the results showed good agreement between the two approaches. The obtained results show that the stresses increase when the interference value increases causing maximum stress intensity at the inner surface of the two assembled parts to exceed their material yield stress. After hollow shaft plastic collapse, any increase in interference results in a small increase in residual contact pressure with a large increase of the equivalent stresses localized at the hollow shaft inner surface. The method could be used to determine the maximum value of the interference in order to prevent assembly failure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Review on Modelling and Simulations (IREMOS)Same topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207