Bibliographic record
Abstract
En mettant les relations entre l’action et la réalité au centre de la théorie sociale, l’article propose d’explorer de nouvelles orientations possibles pour le travail sociologique. L’interrogation première de la sociologie doit porter sur un monde social où, quelle que soit la force des coercitions, il est toujours possible d’agir autrement. Face à l’élasticité foncière de la vie sociale, et afin de contrer le vertige suscité par l’illimitation de l’action, les sociétés ont institué différentes limites indépassables de la réalité. Quatre grands domaines donnant forme à différents régimes de réalité ont historiquement rempli cette fonction (la religion, la politique, l’économie, l’écologie), en articulant présupposés imaginaires et expériences effectives. Dans les sociétés contemporaines, c’est à l’économie, véritable régime hégémonique de réalité, et en partie à l’écologie, que reviennent cette fonction. La reconnaissance des spécificités de cette dimension ouvre à de nouvelles problématiques sociologiques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.052 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".