A rediscovered "Mark Antony and Cleopatra" by Gérard de Lairesse in Copenhagen
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines the motif of a painting from c. 1678-1681 by Gerard de Lairesse that since 1759 has been part of the Copenhagen Royal Collection (KMS sp305). Originally believed to represent Mark Antony and Cleopatra, it has since the mid-nineteenth century been labeled Alexader and Roxane. For a number of reason, the original title seems preferable. First, the woman in the painting seems royal; second, she resembles rather closely de Lairesse's two other Cleopatras, in Amsterdam and Toronto. The decoration of her palace, finally, is exactly similar to what one sees in the famous Amsterdam painting. Given de Lairesse's inventive manner is providing suitable settings for his protaginists, it seems to follow that we here, once again, have an event taking place in the palace of Cleopatra in Alexadria.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".