Bibliographic record
Abstract
目的：探讨骨肉瘤患者的疼痛、负性情绪、睡眠和生活质量及其相互关系。方法：应用简式McGill疼痛问卷（SF-MPQ）、疼痛自我效能感问卷（PSEQ）、贝克抑郁量表（BDI）、贝克焦虑量表（BAI）、阿森斯失眠量表（AIS）、简式健康相关生活质量问卷（SF-12）对139名骨肉瘤患者和139名健康者的疼痛、情绪、睡眠和生活质量进行评估。结果：61.2%的骨肉瘤患者有中等以上强度的疼痛,PSEQ分与疼痛强度呈明显负相关（P〈0.001）;骨肉瘤组在情绪、睡眠、生活质量等量表上的得分均明显高于正常对照组（P〈0.01）;骨肉瘤组在疼痛、情绪、睡眠、生活质量等量表上的得分之间存在相关关系（P〈0.05）。结论：骨肉瘤导致患者存在疼痛、抑郁、焦虑和睡眠问题,且这些问题相互影响,使得骨肉瘤患者生活质量降低。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".