MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517461177

骨肉瘤患者的疼痛、负性情绪、睡眠和生活质量及其相互关系

2010· article· zh· W2517461177 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
沈奕, P Hoang The Dan

Bibliographic record

VenueActa Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Sunyatseni · 2010
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

目的:探讨骨肉瘤患者的疼痛、负性情绪、睡眠和生活质量及其相互关系。方法:应用简式McGill疼痛问卷(SF-MPQ)、疼痛自我效能感问卷(PSEQ)、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、阿森斯失眠量表(AIS)、简式健康相关生活质量问卷(SF-12)对139名骨肉瘤患者和139名健康者的疼痛、情绪、睡眠和生活质量进行评估。结果:61.2%的骨肉瘤患者有中等以上强度的疼痛,PSEQ分与疼痛强度呈明显负相关(P〈0.001);骨肉瘤组在情绪、睡眠、生活质量等量表上的得分均明显高于正常对照组(P〈0.01);骨肉瘤组在疼痛、情绪、睡眠、生活质量等量表上的得分之间存在相关关系(P〈0.05)。结论:骨肉瘤导致患者存在疼痛、抑郁、焦虑和睡眠问题,且这些问题相互影响,使得骨肉瘤患者生活质量降低。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.061

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.005
Scholarly communication0.0060.008
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueActa Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis SunyatseniSame topicMedical Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207