Bibliographic record
Abstract
Perceptual grouping is essential to manage the complexity of real world scenes. We explore bottom-up grouping at three different levels. Starting from low-level grouping, we propose a novel method for oversegmenting an image into compact superpixels, reducing the complexity of many high-level tasks. Unlike most low-level segmentation techniques, our geometric flow formulation enables us to impose additional compactness constraints, resulting in a fast method with minimal undersegmentation. Our subsequent work utilizes compact superpixels to detect two important mid-level shape regularities, closure and symmetry. Unlike the majority of closure detection approaches, we transform the closure detection problem into one of finding a subset of superpixels whose collective boundary has strong edge support in the image. Building on superpixels, we define a closure cost which is a ratio of a novel learned boundary gap measure to area, and show how it can be globally minimized to recover a small set of promising shape hypotheses. In our final contribution, motivated by the success of shape skeletons, we recover and group symmetric parts without assuming prior figure-ground segmentation. Further exploiting superpixel compactness, superpixels are this time used as an approximation to deformable maximal discs that comprise a medial axis. A learned measure of affinity between neighboring superpixels and between symmetric parts enables the purely bottom-up recovery of a skeleton-like structure, facilitating indexing and generic object recognition in complex real images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".