MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517562915 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2016.7527328

Global resource capacity algorithm with path splitting for virtual network embedding

2016· article· en· W2517562915 on OpenAlexaff
Soroush Haeri, Qingye Ding, Zhida Li, Ljiljana Trajković

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5G
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetwork virtualizationComputer scienceDijkstra's algorithmVirtual networkAlgorithmDistributed computingSoftware deploymentVirtualizationShortest path problemResource (disambiguation)The InternetPath (computing)EmbeddingNetwork architectureComputer networkTheoretical computer scienceGraphOperating systemArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Network visualization enables support and deployment of new services and applications that the current Internet architecture is unable to support. Virtual Network Embedding (VNE) problem that addresses efficient mapping of virtual network elements onto a physical infrastructure (substrate network) is one of the main challenges in network virtualization. The Global Resource Capacity (GRC) is a VNE algorithm that utilizes for virtual link mapping a modified version of Dijkstra's shortest path algorithm. In this paper, we propose the GRC-M algorithm that utilizes the Multicommodity Flow (MCF) algorithm. MCF enables path splitting and yields to higher substrate resource utilizations. Simulation results show that MCF significantly enhances performance of the GRC algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoftware-Defined Networks and 5GFrench-language works237,207