Indicators of Efficiency in Four Milky Genotypes in Outdoor Pasture Conditions in the Ecuadorian Amazonia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p class="sar-body"><span lang="EN-US">The aim of this work was the evaluation of four milky genotypes at first lactation in outdoor pasture conditions through indicators of biological efficiency in the Canton Arosemena Tola, Province of Napo- Ecuador. 36 milky cows at first deliver crossbreeds of different genotypes (Bos Indicus x each genotype used): Bos Indicus x Gyr (Gyr), Bos Indicus x Brown Swiss (BS), Bos Indicus x Jersey (J) and Bos Indicus Sahiwal (S). For the productive variables studied there were no significant differences (p≥0.05) among the four genotypes. For the reproductive variables analyzed there were significant differences (p ≤ 0.001) among the four genotypes studied as regards the age at first delivery. Concerning the rest of the variables there were no significant differences (p≥0.05). Neither were there significant differences (p≥0.05) of weight at delivery among the four genotypes; however differences appeared 90 days after the delivery (p ≤ 0.01) and at healing (p ≤ 0.01). It is concluded that the four genotypes studied behave in a similar way, in agreement with the region of study. None of the milky genotypes studied stands out from the others, showing a similarity in this aspect.</span></p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".