MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2517618989 · doi:10.4000/assr.27422

Lionel Obadia, Shalom Bouddha. Judaïsme et bouddhisme, une rencontre inattendue

2015· article· fr· W2517618989 on OpenAlexaff
Mira Niculescu

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives de sciences sociales des religions · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicIndian and Buddhist Studies
Canadian institutionsLibrary and Archives Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsShalomSociologyPhilosophyTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enfin un ouvrage universitaire sur les Juifs bouddhistes ! Aux États-Unis, dans les années soixante, l’engagement de baby-boomers d’origine juive dans le bouddhisme a été tellement remarqué que l’on a commencé à parler des « Juifs-bouddhistes » comme d’une nouvelle figure à trait d’union. Ce phénomène de la contre-culture devient connu du grand public avec la publication en 1991 du best-seller américain Le Juif dans le Lotus, un récit relatant le voyage d’une délégation de rabbins américains...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.054
Threshold uncertainty score0.106

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0100.007
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.174
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArchives de sciences sociales des religionsSame topicIndian and Buddhist StudiesFrench-language works237,207