MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2517807478 · doi:10.2196/mental.6532

Metadata (ORCID) Correction: Effectiveness of Internet-Based Interventions for the Prevention of Mental Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2016· review· en· W2517807478 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lasse Sander, Leonie Rausch, Harald Baumeister

Bibliographic record

VenueJMIR Mental Health · 2016
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDigital Mental Health Interventions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetadataMeta-analysisPsychological interventionThe InternetSystematic reviewMedicineWorld Wide WebMEDLINEPsychologyComputer scienceInformation retrievalPsychiatryInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ORC-ID of the first author (Lasse Sander, Dipl Psych) belonged to another author with the same name. The correct ORCID is: orcid.org/0000-0002-4222-9837. The error has been corrected on the JMIR website on August 19, 2016.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.045
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.488
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score0.749

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0450.488
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.007
Bibliometrics0.0230.031
Science and technology studies0.0040.003
Scholarly communication0.0120.009
Open science0.0100.008
Research integrity0.0080.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4750.128

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.509
Teacher spread0.364 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJMIR Mental Health→Same topicDigital Mental Health Interventions→French-language works237,207→