Dual-Emissive Platinum(II) Metallacycles with Thiophene-Containing Bisacetylide Ligands
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three cis-diphosphino Pt(II) metallacycles with thiophene-containing bisacetylide ligands were synthesized and their absorption and emission properties examined. These properties are explained by DFT and TD-DFT analysis of ground-state as well as singlet- and triplet-state energies and geometries. Two of the metallacycles show room-temperature dual emission (fluorescence and phosphorescence) with different intensity ratios. Replacing the phenylene or ethynylene groups with thiophene rings in the bisacetylide ligand of the metallacycles results in modulation of the S1 and T1 states to show stronger fluorescence and weaker phosphorescence. More rigid and planar metallacycles suffer less from energy loss due to smaller degrees of structural reorganization and thermal deactivation. These are important factors to consider when designing single-component dual-emissive materials for applications such as white-emitting OLEDs, self-referencing oxygen sensors, and hypoxia contrast agents.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".