MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Meta-Analysis of the Worldwide Prevalence of Pica during Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period

2016· article· en· W2517908797 on OpenAlex
Emily Fawcett, Jonathan M. Fawcett, Dwight Mazmanian

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetric Anesthesia Digest · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicTherapeutic Uses of Natural Elements
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePica (typography)ChildbirthObstetricsPregnancyMeta-analysisPostpartum periodEnvironmental healthDemographyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

( Int J Gynaecol Obstet . 2016;133(3):277–283) Pica, the purposeful consumption of nonfood or non-nutritive substances, is commonly reported in women during the period surrounding childbirth. However, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-5 does not provide a prevalence estimate for pica, and current prevalence estimates during pregnancy range from 0.007% in Denmark to 92.5% in Nigeria. In this meta-analysis, authors estimated the prevalence of pica in pregnant and postpartum populations and characterized potential contributing factors/moderators.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.064
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it