MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2518276368 · doi:10.14740/jem.v6i4.370

Swinging From Hypothyroidism to Hyperthyroidism: A Rare Entity Yet With Different Pathophysiology (Case-Based Review)

2016· article· en· W2518276368 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Maria Faraz

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsHamilton General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLevothyroxineMedicineEuthyroidInternal medicinePathophysiologyPediatricsThyroid function testsEndocrinologyThyroid functionThyroid

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although rare but some patients developed hyperthyroidism preceded by hypothyroidism after being treated with levothyroxine. I reported a 35-year-old male who developed hyperthyroidism after getting treated with levothyroxine for hypothyroidism. Patient showed evident clinical and biochemical hypothyroidism with TSH of 175 ? U/mL and free T4 of 2.7 pmol/L, and started on levothyroxine. Levothyroxine was stopped after 3 years as he had become euthyroid. However, over a period of 1 year, he gradually had developed thyrotoxic state with TSH less than 0.01 ? U/mL and T4 of 26 pmol/L and clinical symptoms of thyrotoxicosis. He has now started on methimazole 5 mg/day and will be followed up in 6 months. Therefore, physicians are required to have a frequent assessment of thyroid function test to identify the occurrence of this rare entity of swinging from hypothyroidism to hyperthyroidism in order to initiate proper treatment. J Endocrinol Metab. 2016;6(4):127-128 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jem370w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Endocrinology and MetabolismSame topicThyroid Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207